As an actuary, I’ve always been aware of the motto for the Society of Actuaries which is a John Ruskin quote. “The work of science is to substitute facts for appearances and demonstrations for impressions.” I quote this regularly when I speak to lawmakers pushing ideas based on assertions, hearsay and plausibility rather than on facts and science. I’ve come to truly appreciate the wisdom that was John Ruskin.
There has been so much focus lately on the cost of retirement plans that the discussion often weighs too heavily on fees to the detriment of an analysis of the value received for what is paid. It brings to mind another quote from Ruskin, “There is scarcely anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse, and sell a little more cheaply. The person who buys on price alone is this man’s lawful prey.”
With regard to retirement plan services, it brings to mind the complexity of administration in a 403(b) plan, or any other defined contribution plan for that matter, when administration requires taking into account contracts from multiple providers. This could be in a multiple provider environment or a single provider environment with plan assets in legacy contracts with prior providers. I frequently hear about service providers in the marketplace that represent these complicated administrative requirements with statements like “don’t worry about it, we’ve got it covered”. Fees charged are typically low.
The devil is in the details.
Responsible plan fiduciaries and their advisors need to ask the tough questions to get under the surface to see what they’re actually getting for the price, and whether or not it’s really a good value.
Some of the questions I suggest:
- How are small-amount force-outs handled across contracts with multiple providers to ensure dollar limitations are not exceeded?
- How are QDROs handled to ensure ALL plan assets are appropriately taken into account? Remember that QDROs are a plan concept and therefore a domestic relations order issued to a provider for their contract cannot be a QDRO. It must be issued to the plan and the Plan Administrator can only approve it as qualified if it meets all of the plan’s requirements, including clearly delineating how the entire account balance (taking into account all providers) are to be treated.
- How are beneficiary designations tracked and handled for death claims? I note that most plans I’ve read talk about beneficiary designation for the plan – yet in practice, providers seem to want their own beneficiary designation on file. If there are conflicting beneficiary designations, it’s a lawsuit waiting to happen.
Generally speaking, the low cost providers that say “we’ve got you covered” haven’t even thought about these issues. If the plan winds up with tax code or regulatory violations, or lawsuits by beneficiaries, is that lower cost really worth it?
Ruskin also said, “It’s unwise to pay too much, but it’s worse to pay too little. When you pay too much, you lose a little money – that’s all. When you pay too little, you sometime lose everything, because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to do. The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot – it can’t be done. If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well to add something for the risk you run, and if you do that you have enough to pay for something better.”
In a more commonly heard expression, “You get what you pay for.”
Has this been your experience as well? Let’s chat in the comments.
In addition to blogging here, I also tweet regularly about topics of interest to Tax Exempt plans. Follow me on Twitter: @1aaronfriedman1.
While this communication may be used to promote or market a transaction or an idea that is discussed in the publication, it is intended to provide general information about the subject matter covered and is provided with the understanding that none of the member companies of The Principal are rendering legal, accounting, or tax advice. It is not a marketed opinion and may not be used to avoid penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. You should consult with appropriate counsel or other advisors on all matters pertaining to legal, tax, or accounting obligations and requirements.
Insurance products and plan administrative services are provided by Principal Life Insurance Company, a member of the Principal Financial Group® (The Principal®), Des Moines, IA 50392.
© 2014 Principal Financial Services, Inc. │ t14080603wb